Best Known (168, 208, s)-Nets in Base 2
(168, 208, 268)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 208, 268)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 24, 8)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (144, 184, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (4, 24, 8)-net over F2, using
(168, 208, 608)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (168, 208, 608)-net over F2, using
(168, 208, 11191)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 208, 11192)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 411 970712 298925 173101 190499 873201 242591 235649 719702 026396 402997 > 2208 [i]