Best Known (163, 212, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163, 212, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 212, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (162, 212, 195)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
(163, 212, 361)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 212, 361)-net over F2, using
(163, 212, 4308)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 212, 4309)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (163, 211, 4309)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3292 554903 649291 767034 506346 293254 505651 811513 845689 845799 625896 > 2211 [i]