Best Known (171, 212, s)-Nets in Base 2
(171, 212, 268)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 212, 268)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 24, 8)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (147, 188, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 47, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 47, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (4, 24, 8)-net over F2, using
(171, 212, 606)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (171, 212, 606)-net over F2, using
(171, 212, 12420)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 212, 12421)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (171, 211, 12421)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3292 979615 884889 954711 887121 719671 205936 605966 624451 238719 266136 > 2211 [i]