Best Known (130, 213, s)-Nets in Base 2
(130, 213, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 213, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 60, 20)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 153, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (19, 60, 20)-net over F2, using
(130, 213, 103)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 213, 103)-net over F2, using
(130, 213, 523)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 213, 524)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 212, 524)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6991 373378 899064 240817 072671 901601 854463 457415 457278 807180 569520 > 2212 [i]