Best Known (133, 214, s)-Nets in Base 2
(133, 214, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 214, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 79, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 135, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 79, 33)-net over F2, using
(133, 214, 111)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (133, 214, 111)-net over F2, using
(133, 214, 575)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 214, 576)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 213, 576)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14005 731124 852868 957174 782969 921124 167076 735122 766533 218774 901195 > 2213 [i]