Best Known (159, 214, s)-Nets in Base 2
(159, 214, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 214, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (158, 214, 195)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 216, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 72, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 72, 65)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 216, 195)-net over F2, using
(159, 214, 275)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (159, 214, 275)-net over F2, using
(159, 214, 2549)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 214, 2550)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (159, 213, 2550)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13208 155089 778824 227848 584488 345534 973092 817489 321777 199122 521928 > 2213 [i]