Best Known (162, 215, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 215, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 215, 195)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 222, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 74, 65)-net over F8, using
(162, 215, 309)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 215, 309)-net over F2, using
(162, 215, 3131)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 215, 3132)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 214, 3132)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26481 727066 153499 005902 787890 295690 502576 768532 889137 130818 141721 > 2214 [i]