Best Known (171, 215, s)-Nets in Base 2
(171, 215, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 215, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
(171, 215, 514)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (171, 215, 514)-net over F2, using
(171, 215, 7887)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 215, 7888)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 52688 680003 594438 590253 677890 578638 028612 732099 870789 848132 360732 > 2215 [i]