Best Known (38, 215, s)-Nets in Base 2
(38, 215, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 215, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 215, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 215, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (38, 215, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 215, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 215, 48)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 215, 49)-net in base 2, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 187, 49)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2187, 49, S2, 4, 149), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 17262 029772 313372 100548 420913 821082 644281 477472 276094 910464 / 75 > 2187 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2187, 49, S2, 4, 149), but