Best Known (125, 222, s)-Nets in Base 2
(125, 222, 63)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (125, 222, 63)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (125, 225, 63)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 71, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 154, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 71, 21)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(125, 222, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (125, 222, 82)-net over F2, using
(125, 222, 389)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (125, 222, 390)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (125, 221, 390)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 733122 961999 397173 919402 667478 444632 042687 060149 630752 480271 256568 > 2221 [i]