Best Known (133, 225, s)-Nets in Base 2
(133, 225, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 225, 68)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 140, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
(133, 225, 97)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (133, 225, 97)-net over F2, using
(133, 225, 469)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 225, 470)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 784522 850570 225929 577823 279574 403739 233765 032864 627640 901407 505040 > 2225 [i]