Best Known (163, 226, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163, 226, 144)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 226, 144)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 228, 144)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 76, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 76, 48)-net over F8, using
(163, 226, 236)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 226, 236)-net over F2, using
(163, 226, 1855)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 226, 1856)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (163, 225, 1856)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 54 568790 353272 166071 175298 581890 202529 070092 336215 175065 825439 050221 > 2225 [i]