Best Known (181, 227, s)-Nets in Base 2
(181, 227, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 227, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (180, 227, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
(181, 227, 554)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 227, 554)-net over F2, using
(181, 227, 8786)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 227, 8787)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 215 947336 255968 898831 007781 682669 099734 241387 634039 061140 730761 947840 > 2227 [i]