Best Known (136, 228, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 228, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 228, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (51, 143, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
(136, 228, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 228, 101)-net over F2, using
(136, 228, 493)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 228, 494)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 433 243943 278033 880354 001956 118976 312357 579881 609742 768637 203762 722120 > 2228 [i]