Best Known (16, 23, s)-Nets in Base 2
(16, 23, 127)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 23, 127)-net over F2, using
(16, 23, 289)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 23, 290)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 22, 290)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 4 234436 > 222 [i]