Best Known (136, 230, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 230, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 230, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 66, 20)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 164, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (19, 66, 20)-net over F2, using
(136, 230, 99)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 230, 99)-net over F2, using
(136, 230, 479)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 230, 480)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1743 561104 300966 784641 394103 556711 994107 576410 813922 269851 600889 419406 > 2230 [i]