Best Known (139, 230, s)-Nets in Base 2
(139, 230, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (139, 230, 75)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (139, 231, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 146, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(139, 230, 107)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (139, 230, 107)-net over F2, using
(139, 230, 536)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (139, 230, 537)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (139, 229, 537)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 920 982199 673853 627249 258638 896500 924263 832215 520352 762106 632145 361792 > 2229 [i]