Best Known (181, 231, s)-Nets in Base 2
(181, 231, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 231, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (180, 231, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
(181, 231, 464)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 231, 464)-net over F2, using
(181, 231, 6116)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 231, 6117)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3452 333853 718082 653699 209704 039820 268379 648894 104131 388416 547310 760616 > 2231 [i]