Best Known (160, 233, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160, 233, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 233, 112)-net over F2, using
- 21 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(160, 233, 183)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 233, 183)-net over F2, using
(160, 233, 1191)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 233, 1192)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 232, 1192)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7061 757772 758613 656905 830356 898111 931607 448535 154309 183821 734609 167863 > 2232 [i]