Best Known (140, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(140, 235, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 235, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 149, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
(140, 235, 103)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 235, 103)-net over F2, using
(140, 235, 512)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 235, 513)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 234, 513)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27937 687221 701983 650898 130926 665649 513719 032705 888964 647334 985859 416064 > 2234 [i]