Best Known (141, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(141, 235, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (141, 235, 75)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (141, 237, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 87, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 150, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 87, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(141, 235, 106)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (141, 235, 106)-net over F2, using
(141, 235, 521)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (141, 235, 522)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57896 291757 503623 224439 060155 237936 140062 494583 637918 263157 462038 953216 > 2235 [i]