Best Known (190, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(190, 235, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 235, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 31, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 31, 12)-net over F2, using
(190, 235, 680)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (190, 235, 680)-net over F2, using
(190, 235, 14379)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 235, 14380)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (190, 234, 14380)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27636 071481 532649 243633 079697 714077 681424 670900 613431 860372 759665 881956 > 2234 [i]