Best Known (145, 239, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145, 239, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 239, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (59, 153, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
(145, 239, 112)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 239, 112)-net over F2, using
(145, 239, 556)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 239, 557)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 887676 350469 093985 174578 921181 468537 806983 936501 393116 510706 697927 883576 > 2239 [i]