Best Known (190, 239, s)-Nets in Base 2
(190, 239, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 239, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (189, 239, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
(190, 239, 558)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (190, 239, 558)-net over F2, using
(190, 239, 9439)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 239, 9440)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (190, 238, 9440)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 442261 238495 698126 775554 033961 038851 082970 933335 460706 933077 744593 575659 > 2238 [i]