Best Known (160, 240, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160, 240, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 240, 112)-net over F2, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(160, 240, 163)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 240, 163)-net over F2, using
(160, 240, 951)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 240, 952)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 820751 319893 688659 177587 990508 882168 657407 199042 958640 056274 796134 605990 > 2240 [i]