Best Known (195, 241, s)-Nets in Base 2
(195, 241, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (195, 241, 272)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (194, 240, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 32, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (162, 208, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 32, 12)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(195, 241, 702)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (195, 241, 702)-net over F2, using
(195, 241, 13416)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (195, 241, 13417)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 538601 334203 444325 536728 059178 842002 783796 251495 387517 671326 650297 057280 > 2241 [i]