Best Known (166, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(166, 242, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(166, 242, 188)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (166, 242, 188)-net over F2, using
(166, 242, 1185)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 242, 1186)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 070746 705942 268884 081746 964230 548123 370415 048872 628344 125992 394201 078976 > 2242 [i]