Best Known (185, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(185, 242, 200)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (185, 242, 200)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 29, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (156, 213, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 71, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (1, 29, 5)-net over F2, using
(185, 242, 385)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (185, 242, 385)-net over F2, using
(185, 242, 4364)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (185, 242, 4365)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (185, 241, 4365)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 548082 551960 479386 052463 364235 846358 733285 893767 500172 713508 959824 003536 > 2241 [i]