Best Known (187, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(187, 242, 206)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (187, 242, 206)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 35, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (152, 207, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 69, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 69, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (8, 35, 11)-net over F2, using
(187, 242, 423)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (187, 242, 423)-net over F2, using
(187, 242, 5273)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (187, 242, 5274)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (187, 241, 5274)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 540758 548420 332499 596852 094846 175692 482249 369020 109119 944565 199716 358788 > 2241 [i]