Best Known (190, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(190, 242, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 242, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (189, 242, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 61, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (189, 244, 260)-net over F2, using
(190, 242, 493)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (190, 242, 493)-net over F2, using
(190, 242, 6647)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 242, 6648)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 069364 297949 398924 359679 101716 797977 624298 329344 767316 230449 051890 807308 > 2242 [i]