Best Known (187, 243, s)-Nets in Base 2
(187, 243, 204)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (187, 243, 204)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 33, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (154, 210, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 70, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (5, 33, 9)-net over F2, using
(187, 243, 409)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (187, 243, 409)-net over F2, using
(187, 243, 4587)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (187, 243, 4588)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 137368 124781 174712 294645 923613 829841 559632 051207 722061 256770 159900 660520 > 2243 [i]