Best Known (163, 246, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163, 246, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 246, 112)-net over F2, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
(163, 246, 162)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 246, 162)-net over F2, using
(163, 246, 956)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 246, 957)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (163, 245, 957)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 58 183512 031938 882638 376287 847658 379445 495760 487459 331060 358859 136184 977810 > 2245 [i]