Best Known (163, 251, s)-Nets in Base 2
(163, 251, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 251, 112)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
(163, 251, 151)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 251, 151)-net over F2, using
(163, 251, 836)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 251, 837)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3720 243018 305120 460906 212384 638899 391764 004413 678113 248401 067537 261968 792920 > 2251 [i]