Best Known (165, 251, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165, 251, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 251, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 251, 112)-net over F2, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(165, 251, 159)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 251, 159)-net over F2, using
(165, 251, 903)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 251, 904)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3760 901003 012381 713586 181173 165767 838170 394028 984573 245948 252659 132700 569392 > 2251 [i]