Best Known (195, 253, s)-Nets in Base 2
(195, 253, 206)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (195, 253, 206)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 37, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (158, 216, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 72, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 72, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (8, 37, 11)-net over F2, using
(195, 253, 430)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (195, 253, 430)-net over F2, using
(195, 253, 4892)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (195, 253, 4893)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14484 548860 437154 426333 681822 608830 950157 455101 191909 463435 455698 257392 999418 > 2253 [i]