Best Known (208, 258, s)-Nets in Base 2
(208, 258, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (208, 258, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 34, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (174, 224, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 56, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 56, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 34, 12)-net over F2, using
(208, 258, 707)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (208, 258, 707)-net over F2, using
(208, 258, 12972)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (208, 258, 12973)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 463710 198360 214077 098149 797730 833440 042365 192439 974993 294055 332839 436385 534420 > 2258 [i]