Best Known (165, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165, 259, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(165, 259, 144)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 259, 144)-net over F2, using
(165, 259, 770)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 259, 771)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 978356 921926 300919 692578 788171 816340 652438 948241 189703 078321 390331 401299 415168 > 2259 [i]