Best Known (100, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(100, 260, 55)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 260, 55)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (100, 54)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 6 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
(100, 260, 65)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (100, 260, 65)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (95, 260, 65)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 95 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (95, 64)-sequence over F2, using
(100, 260, 190)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 260, 191)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 427319 348223 279665 147859 478720 901248 070918 001441 367605 903218 862799 129538 865890 > 2260 [i]