Best Known (43, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(43, 260, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 260, 33)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 260, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(43, 260, 34)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (43, 260, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 43 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
(43, 260, 52)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 260, 53)-net in base 2, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 257, 53)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2257, 53, S2, 5, 214), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1 852673 427797 059126 777135 760139 006525 652319 754650 249024 631321 344126 610074 238976 / 5 > 2257 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2257, 53, S2, 5, 214), but