Best Known (30, 57, s)-Nets in Base 2
(30, 57, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 57, 24)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 21, 12)-net over F2, using
- digital (9, 36, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
(30, 57, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (30, 57, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 57, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(30, 57, 90)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 57, 91)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 56, 91)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(256, 91, S2, 26), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2655 090149 977067 154866 962432 / 34361 762295 > 256 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(256, 91, S2, 26), but