Best Known (32, 59, s)-Nets in Base 2
(32, 59, 26)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 59, 26)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 21, 12)-net over F2, using
- digital (11, 38, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
(32, 59, 27)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (32, 59, 27)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 59, 27)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 26)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 26)-sequence over F2, using
(32, 59, 105)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (32, 59, 106)-net over F2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (32, 58, 106)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(258, 106, F2, 26) (dual of [106, 48, 27]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(259, 107, F2, 27) (dual of [107, 48, 28]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(258, 106, F2, 26) (dual of [106, 48, 27]-code), but
(32, 59, 106)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 59, 107)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 58, 107)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(258, 107, S2, 26), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 63905 115152 312301 338462 624561 945060 065807 433728 / 207189 126759 202717 834639 422345 > 258 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(258, 107, S2, 26), but