Best Known (29, 61, s)-Nets in Base 2
(29, 61, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 61, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 61, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(29, 61, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (29, 61, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 61, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(29, 61, 65)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (29, 61, 66)-net over F2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(261, 66, F2, 32) (dual of [66, 5, 33]-code), but
(29, 61, 69)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 61, 70)-net in base 2, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 59, 70)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(259, 70, S2, 30), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 23 634890 844440 363008 / 35 > 259 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(259, 70, S2, 30), but