Best Known (47, 61, s)-Nets in Base 2
(47, 61, 96)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 61, 96)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (46, 60, 96)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 24)-net over F16, using
(47, 61, 155)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (47, 61, 155)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(261, 155, F2, 14) (dual of [155, 94, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(261, 277, F2, 14) (dual of [277, 216, 15]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(262, 278, F2, 15) (dual of [278, 216, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(261, 277, F2, 14) (dual of [277, 216, 15]-code), using
(47, 61, 1409)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 61, 1410)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 309520 154234 686848 > 261 [i]