Best Known (37, 77, s)-Nets in Base 2
(37, 77, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 77, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 77, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(37, 77, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (37, 77, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 77, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(37, 77, 82)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (37, 77, 83)-net over F2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(277, 83, F2, 40) (dual of [83, 6, 41]-code), but
(37, 77, 85)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 77, 86)-net in base 2, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 75, 86)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(275, 86, S2, 38), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 6 120186 961799 060196 950016 / 125 > 275 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(275, 86, S2, 38), but