MinT - Best Known (40, 85, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (40, 85, s)-Nets in Base 2

(40, 85, 33)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (40, 85, 33)-net over F₂, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F₂, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F₂, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
    - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(40, 85, 89)-Net over F₂ — Upper bound on s (digital)

There is no digital (40, 85, 90)-net over F₂, because

5 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (40, 80, 90)-net over F₂, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2⁸⁰, 90, F₂, 40) (dual of [90, 10, 41]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2⁴⁰, 49, F₂, 20) (dual of [49, 9, 21]-code), but
    - â€œJaâ€ bound on codes from Brouwerâ€™s database [i]

(40, 85, 91)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (40, 85, 92)-net in base 2, because

3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 82, 92)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2⁸², 92, S₂, 42), but
  - the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 4100 676380 132822 160603 348992 / 693 > 2⁸² [i]