Best Known (42, 85, s)-Nets in Base 2
(42, 85, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 85, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(42, 85, 94)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (42, 85, 95)-net over F2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (42, 84, 95)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(284, 95, F2, 42) (dual of [95, 11, 43]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(285, 96, F2, 43) (dual of [96, 11, 44]-code), but
- “Bro†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(285, 96, F2, 43) (dual of [96, 11, 44]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(284, 95, F2, 42) (dual of [95, 11, 43]-code), but
(42, 85, 97)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 85, 98)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 84, 98)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(284, 98, S2, 42), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 28936 848418 295763 925767 028736 / 1443 > 284 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(284, 98, S2, 42), but