Best Known (40, 88, s)-Nets in Base 2
(40, 88, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 88, 33)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 88, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(40, 88, 89)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (40, 88, 90)-net over F2, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (40, 80, 90)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(280, 90, F2, 40) (dual of [90, 10, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(240, 49, F2, 20) (dual of [49, 9, 21]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(280, 90, F2, 40) (dual of [90, 10, 41]-code), but
(40, 88, 90)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 88, 91)-net in base 2, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 86, 91)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(286, 91, S2, 46), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 3713 820117 856140 824697 372672 / 47 > 286 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(286, 91, S2, 46), but