Best Known (60, 93, s)-Nets in Base 2
(60, 93, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 93, 60)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 94, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 47, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 47, 30)-net over F4, using
(60, 93, 66)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (60, 93, 66)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 94, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 47, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 47, 33)-net over F4, using
(60, 93, 343)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 93, 344)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 92, 344)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5140 604763 596421 676493 243505 > 292 [i]