Best Known (59−16, 59, s)-Nets in Base 25
(59−16, 59, 2020)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 59, 2020)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 12, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (31, 47, 1954)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2547, 1954, F25, 16, 16) (dual of [(1954, 16), 31217, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2547, 15632, F25, 16) (dual of [15632, 15585, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(13) [i] based on
- linear OA(2546, 15625, F25, 16) (dual of [15625, 15579, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(2540, 15625, F25, 14) (dual of [15625, 15585, 15]-code), using an extension Ce(13) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(251, 7, F25, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(251, s, F25, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(13) [i] based on
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2547, 15632, F25, 16) (dual of [15632, 15585, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2547, 1954, F25, 16, 16) (dual of [(1954, 16), 31217, 17]-NRT-code), using
- digital (4, 12, 66)-net over F25, using
(59−16, 59, 84364)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (43, 59, 84364)-net over F25, using
(59−16, 59, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 59, large)-net in base 25, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 45, large)-net in base 25, but