Best Known (60−22, 60, s)-Nets in Base 25
(60−22, 60, 278)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 60, 278)-net over F25, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 61, 278)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 7, 26)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 21, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 33, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- digital (0, 7, 26)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(60−22, 60, 3578)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (38, 60, 3578)-net over F25, using
(60−22, 60, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 60, large)-net in base 25, because
- 20 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 40, large)-net in base 25, but